Search for: All records

Social isolation hampers immune system function, and the biological mechanisms driving this effect remain understudied. We hypothesized that oxytocin (OT), a key neuropeptide involved in social cognition, is a critical mediator of social context on immune function. In the California mouse (Peromyscus californicus), we examined how female and male immune function is influenced by (1) social isolation from same-sex peers, (2) social peer affiliation, and (3) exogenous OT. We evaluated immune function through wound size progression following a skin biopsy and proinflammatory cytokines in the wound fluid. Unexpectedly, social isolation alone did not influence wound healing, but isolation +OT increased wound size in a dose dependent manner. Wound size progression interacted with sex and OT in socially-housed mice, suggesting that OT increases inflammation in females, while decreasing inflammation in males in a social context-dependent manner. Inflammatory biomarker interleukin-6 (IL-6) mRNA expression correlated with wound size overall, supporting wound healing as an index of inflammatory response. However, isolation +OT mice did not have higher levels of IL-6, suggesting that the mechanism through which isolation +OT influences wound size is not through IL-6 activity. Behaviorally, higher levels of affiliation were negatively associated with wound size, and this effect was diminished by OT treatment. Our results highlight that the anti-inflammatory effects of OT are likely highly dependent on social context. 

Central to the navigation of an ever-changing environment is the ability to form positive associations with places and conspecifics. The functions of location and social conditioned preferences are often studied independently, limiting our understanding of their interplay. Furthermore, a de-emphasis on natural functions of conditioned preferences has led to neurobiological interpretations separated from ecological context. By adopting a naturalistic and ethological perspective, we uncover complexities underlying the expression of conditioned preferences. Development of conditioned preferences is a combination of motivation, reward, associative learning, and context, including for social and spatial environments. Both social- and location-dependent reward-responsive behaviors and their conditioning rely on internal state-gating mechanisms that include neuroendocrine and hormone systems such as opioids, dopamine, testosterone, estradiol, and oxytocin. Such reinforced behavior emerges from mechanisms integrating past experience and current social and environmental conditions. Moreover, social context, environmental stimuli, and internal state gate and modulate motivation and learning via associative reward, shaping the conditioning process. We highlight research incorporating these concepts, focusing on the integration of social neuroendocrine mechanisms and behavioral conditioning. We explore three paradigms: 1) conditioned place preference, 2) conditioned social preference, and 3) social conditioned place preference. We highlight nonclassical species to emphasize the naturalistic applications of these conditioned preferences. To fully appreciate the complex integration of spatial and social information, future research must identify neural networks where endocrine systems exert influence on such behaviors. Such research promises to provide valuable insights into conditioned preferences within a broader naturalistic context. 

Academia in the United States continues to grapple with its longstanding history of racial discrimination and its active perpetuation of racial disparities. To this end, universities and academic societies must grow in ways that reduce racial minoritization and foster racial equity. What are the effective and long-lasting approaches we as academics should prioritize to promote racial equity in our academic communities? To address this, the authors held a diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) panel during the Society for Behavioral Neuroendocrinology 2022 annual meeting, and in the following commentary synthesize the panelists’ recommendations for fostering racial equity in the US academic community.